5 Facts to take away from the tragedy in Newtown, CT

The recent school shooting in Newtown that killed 20 children and 6 adults is a horrific tragedy, and
there are five very important facts to take away from it.

1.) Gun-free zones are extremely dangerous.

In Switzerland, where many adults carry semi-automatic weapons while in the course of their daily activities, “the gun crime rate is so low that statistics are not even kept.”  On the other extreme is Norway, where guns are very tightly controlled. This enabled a shooter to casually take his time massacring over 70 children at the equivalent of a US Boy Scout camp. In a US Boy Scout camp, firearms are typically prevalent among adults and older scouts. The shooter wouldn’t have made it very far.

Just a week before the Newtown shooting, a shooting in Oregon was stopped in its tracks by an armed citizen. A psychopath with a large amount of ammunition was prepared to carry out a massacre. After he got his first few shots off, though, an armed citizen with a legal gun confronted him. The killer decided to take his own life quickly rather than risk a painful death in a shootout.

And apart from lone serial killers on a shooting rampage, it’s important to realize that most gun violence comes from organized crime. In Mexico, where it is very hard for civilians to own weapons, “More civilians were killed [in 2010] in Ciudad Juarez, the Mexican city across the border from El Paso, Texas, than were killed in all of Afghanistan.”

When it is against the law to own a firearm, only criminals have firearms, and law-abiding people can’t prevent a reign of terror.

2.) It is a scientific fact that banning guns does not decrease murder and suicide rates.

A Harvard study very clearly shows that,

“the available international data cannot be squared with the mantra that more guns equal more death and fewer guns equal less death. Rather, if firearms availability does matter, the data consistently show that the way it matters is that more guns equal less violent crime.”

Harvard University is not an institution known for being rabidly pro-gun, but it does carry out impartial, peer-reviewed, scientific research. In its closing statement, the paper cites another study with similar conclusions containing the admonition that,

“If you are surprised by [our] finding[s], so [are we]. [We] did not begin this research with any intent to ‘exonerate’ handguns, but there it is—a negative finding, to be sure, but a negative finding is nevertheless a positive contribution. It directs us where not to aim public health resources.”

3.) A horrifying loss of life leads to rash decisions.

It is easy to get emotional over the deaths of innocent people and pass poorly thought-out legislation in an attempt to make sure they didn’t die in vain. A war was started with Iraq, justified by the lie that Iraq had been complicit in the 9/11 attacks. On the day of the Iraq invasion, 76% of Americans supported the war. Only two years later, when the emotional dust from 9/11 had settled, most Americans thought the Iraq War was a mistake.

We see the same thing happening now:

“Rep. Jerrold Nadler, who serves the 8th District of New York, told liberal talk show host Ed Schultz that horrible incidents like these are becoming more frequent and will continue until the president ‘pushes Congress.’ When asked whether the tragedy could be the turning point for Democrats to finally pass stronger gun laws, he said: ‘I think we will be there if the president exploits it’

4.) One death is a tragedy: One million deaths is a statistic.

Josef Stalin once remarked that, “If a single person dies in front of you, it is a tragedy. If a million people die on the other side of the earth, it is a statistic.”

As President Obama gave a tearful speech for the innocent children killed in Newtown, one wonders why he has never cried about, yet alone mentioned, the hundreds of innocent children that he killed.

“Just one in 50 victims of America’s deadly drone strikes in Pakistan are terrorists – while the rest are innocent civilians, a new report claimed today. The authoritative joint study, by Stanford and New York Universities, concludes that men, women and children are being terrorised by the operations ’24 hours-a-day’… Many parents had taken their children out of school because they were so afraid of a missile-strike.”

The American media does not conduct interviews with grieving Pakistani families. Vigils are not held nation-wide for each of these countless drone strikes. If one tries to demonize the president as a child killer with a far higher body count than the fiend in Newtown, the viewpoint is typically met with overwhelming hostility. The Newtown children are viewed as ours. The Pakistani children are viewed as other, non-important, sub-human.

And the drone strikes in Pakistan pale in comparison to the number of deaths from the aforementioned Iraq War. The US has not conducted a thorough body county there, but estimates are in the neighborhood of one million. A tragedy, indeed.

5.) “Pro-gun” Republicans are anything but.

The US Supreme Court has recognized that the Second Amendment is an individual right. If American adults have the individual right to “keep and bear arms”, and that right “shall not be infringed”, then why are there thousands of federal gun regulations infringing on the right for American adults to keep and bear arms? Can the right of free speech also be infringed? The Supreme Court supposedly has a “conservative” majority, and “conservatives” are supposedly pro-gun, but the Supreme Court said in its decision that these federal firearm regulations are legal.

Mitt Romney, the Republican nominee for president, “backed two gun-control measures that were strongly opposed by the National Rifle Association: the Brady Law, which imposed a five-day waiting period on gun sales, and a ban on certain assault weapons”.

The greatest danger to the right to bear arms comes not from the Democrats, who do not have a majority, but from the Republicans, who might cave and pass “common sense” gun control legislation such as requiring mental health screenings for the purchase of “assault weapons” (a term I find to be a bit redundant, like “death gun”). Of course, this would mean closing the gun show loophole, and it would mean the registration of all purchased guns. Registration is always the prerequisite to confiscation. Governments cannot confiscate unregistered weapons.

So, one might ask, would the disarming of the American public be the end of liberty in America? If it is commonly accepted that the Second Amendment does not have to be followed, then what would keep the government from respecting the First Amendment? England, which has only had gun control for a few decades, has already lost its freedom of speech:

“It has resulted in a string of controversial arrests. They include a 16-year-old boy being held for peacefully holding a placard reading ‘Scientology is a dangerous cult’, and gay rights campaigners from the group Outrage! detained when they protested against Islamic fundamentalist group Hizb ut-Tahrir over its stance on gays, Jews and women.

In China, which has had gun restrictions for nearly a century, critics of the government are sent to labor camps. China has a bill of rights and democratic constitution similar to the US, but the government has no incentive to follow it: The government’s militia is not regulated by the rule of law, since its citizens are disarmed.

In the twentieth century alone, 274 million people were killed by their own governments after their governments had disarmed them. Many say that, “It can’t happen here.” But this is an arrogant form of American exceptionalism, especially since it has happened here with African American slavery and Native American genocide, both inflicted on groups with low access to firearms.

This post was authored and submitted by Andrew Criscione.

Share your stories of police abuse, policies and tactics by clicking here.


  • t.

    Andrew: Very good points. Not all spot on…but very good. In will have to correct you on the “democrats don’t have the majority” mistake though.

  • Pingback: 5 Facts to take away from the tragedy in Newtown, CT | My Brotherz Keeper()

  • shawn

    More correct to say the dems don’t have quite enough to ram through legislation.

    Don’t forget though that brit cops have no problem enforcing bad laws. Don’t want to compare a brit cop against a US cop too much, but if a cop has the choice between his pension and becoming a true soviet style JBT, i’m not betting on him loosing his pension.

    The scene from robocop were the cops tossed their badges rather than play ball looks good in a movie, but isn’t played out when a cop is ordered to do something he knows is morally wrong.

    Remember, the new orleans police had no problem grabbing guns.

  • Chris Mallory

    Don’t forget: Cops don’t stop mass shootings. The mass shooting ends when a citizen shoots the bad guy or when the bad guy shoots himself.

    Disarm cops for a safer America.

    All cops lie, all the time.

  • tz

    As for republicans who claim to be pro-life, the “million is a statistic” applies.

    Within 20, 50, 100 or 200 miles, a Newtown happens every day on average.

    If the unborn are innocent human beings, why are you doing nothing to stop their killers?

    I’m quite sure many here – especially those who have knocked up their girlfriends and are worried about child support – will adopt the view that the unborn aren’t human – not out of reason but of convenience, and some warped view that satisfying ones’ urges takes precedence over the right to life.

    There is no amendment in the bill of rights representing the right to life. But that is because it was considered too obvious to even require enumeration or reservation.

  • Pingback: 5 Facts To Take Away From The Tragedy In Newtown, CT | The Tallahassee O()

  • Rusty Shackleford

    I am sure Common Sense would happily confiscate law abiding citizens firearms if they were banned. How many of you other cops would? How many of you other cops think the Constitution is a hindrance to you?

  • Hey

    I don’t believe that any “Gun laws” would prevent a determined murderer from obtaining guns and kill.

    But there are some interesting questions.

    The Second Amendment is an individual right to keep and bear arms and that right shall not be infringed on.

    But where is the line?

    If we go to the extreme of the argument, what stops a person from building/owning a nuclear device and say it is his right to bear arms?

    What could of been done (if anything) to prevent horrible situations as what happened in newton?

    These are valid questions which deserves a respectful debate.

  • Hey

    I don’t believe that any “Gun laws” would prevent a determined murderer from obtaining guns and kill.

    But there are some interesting questions.

    The Second Amendment is an individual right to keep and bear arms and that right shall not be infringed on.

    But where is the line?

    If we go to the extreme of the argument, what stops a person from building/owning a nuclear device and say it is his right to bear arms?

    What could of been done (if anything) to prevent horrible situations as what happened in Newtown?

    These are valid questions which deserves a respectful debate.

  • Common Sense

    Wow, I am in agreement with most of the points of this article…

  • BluEyeDevil

    Hey common sense,
    If they order you to confiscate guns will you defy those orders? Or will you save your career there buddy? Or how about this one, if a mass shooting happens in your town will you obey the stand down orders and let children die? It appears to me that a lot of police stay outside when a mass shooting happens and wait for better equipped cops to mobilize by that time a shit load people are already dead ie., V. Tech, Columbine, etc. etc. Were those cops that stood down cowards? Or do you believe they were hero’s? LOL. Would you give your life for someone else’s child?

  • BluEyeDevil

    LOL, I got a great one for all of you who love paying taxes, check it out…………..
    Former New Mexico Dona Ana County Detention Center inmate Stephen Slevin won a $22 million verdict in a case involving inhumane solitary confinement. Slevin was arrested on charges of driving while intoxicated and receiving or transferring a stolen vehicle. He was booked into the DACDC shortly after. The plaintiff had a history of mental illness and was placed in solitary confinement. He was finally released on June 25, 2007. Slevin had not received adequate medical care, physical or mental, which had forced him to pull out his own tooth after not receiving dental care. In total, Slevin spent twenty-two months incarcerated as a pre-trial detainee, the majority in solitary confinement. NPAP member attorney Matthew Coyte represented Stephen Slevin in this case. LOL, you fucking moron cops, oh wait a minute I mean fucking moron prison cops

  • Jenna

    “If the unborn are innocent human beings, why are you doing nothing to stop their killers?”

    TZ, I think you should know that I’m every bit as passionate about my pro-choice beliefs as you are about your pro-life perspective. Every time a person like you speaks out to trivialize some horrible tragedy by comparing it to the “Abortion Holocaust,” I interpret it as an act of bitter aggression and I react with a ferocious tactic of my own. I just donated $20 in your honor to the Fund Abortion Now website. Being as I’m just shy of being technically wealthy, my resources in this battle are not inconsiderable.

    There are hundreds – maybe even thousands – of websites, forums, articles, petitions, protests, and other such venues in which your insight would be appreciated and respected. Those murdered children and their grieving families have NOTHING to do with abortion, so it is both selfish and cruel to hop on top of their pain and use it as your soapbox.

    I will add another $20 (at least) for every further comment you make about the subject, so if you’ve got anything else to say that isn’t about gun control or the murder of BORN people, I suggest you make it count.

  • http://yahoo Alvin

    This avenue of gun control, regulation, outlawing, or banning is the surest quickest path to a renewed civil war in this country. You know-more-than-everyone-else libs need to take careful note of this statement. I resolve to make this issue my line in the sand. My grandfather and my father taught me safe gun handling practices. They also taught me the importance of the 2nd Amend. They further warned me that there would be a group of people at some point in the future that would be intent on coming to confiscate my arsenal and that I should prepare for that event. Please take note that I will cache my arsenal rather than submit to your hegemony. I may even sacrifice my life upon the alter of freedom in defiance of your illegal attempts. But, I will not allow the Constitution to be rendered as you see fit. I am prepared, I know there are many similarly prepared. I suppose the relavent question is……..are you Prepared to insist as fervently as I am prepared to resist?

  • Common Sense

    Calm down Alvin, no one is coming for your guns….unless you live in IL, but luckily, the Dems lacked the votes. I find it odd, most copblockers are best labeled as liberal Dems, the same group that wants to take ‘your’ guns. It seems that whom you elect in local elections do matter. Make your selections.

    I wonder if Alvin or the copblocker would accpet the trade, forfeit your guns, except say plugged shotguns and single shot, bolt action rifles with no more then a 3-round capacity, in exchange for the leglization of marijuana. Any takers?

  • Pingback: 5 Facts to take away from the tragedy in Newtown, CT | FreeWestRadio.com()

  • Joker

    This article is pro gun while another article on the front page has a picture of a gun crossed out.. Make up your mind.

    And the Oregon shooting was stopped by an off duty deputy sheriff if I am not mistaken

  • quail

    I suppose very few of you here ever thought that Obama would implement and Executive Order to further restrict or even ban our 2nd Amendment? The Huffington Post talked about this possibility back in May 2011. Now it is here, what are we gonna do?

  • Pingback: The Oscars, spectacle, power, and the media-political complex | Consentient()

  • http://bid-ninja.com/quibids-win-on-quibids-using-this-free-plugin/ How to Win On Qubidz

    Thank you for such a good blog. Where else could 1 get these kinds of information written in these kinds of an incite full way? I have a presentation that I am just now working on, and I have been trying to find such information.