I have the inalienable and absolute right to use lethal force to protect myself, my family, and my property from thugs, both common and those thugs organized under a concept called “government”.
This absolute human right is acknowledged in the 2nd amendment to the US constitution, but it exists independent of any government rule, edict, or procedure. Any attempt to curb or limit this right, through the limitation, license, tax, or registration of firearms and/or firearm owners is necessarily an abridgment of the inalienable rights of man. Those who seek to use the power of government to control the manufacture, transfer, and ownership of firearms amputate independence from the human condition.
The result: a grand protection racket that is ripe for all manner of violent abuses. The use of government to disarm a populace creates entire classes totally dependent upon others for security and protection. That the mafia could be so lucky.
There has long been a continued monopolization of the protection of individuals by the government. A disarmament would be the final blow to lead to a complete monopolization of security and an enslaved populace.
The forced dependence upon the state for security of life and property is the blackest of tyrannies. As Mohandas Gandhi wrote: ‘Among the many misdeeds of the British rule in India, history will look upon the Act depriving a whole nation of arms as the blackest.’ In India today, women clamor for firearms to protect themselves from the rape and abuse ignored by civil authorities.
We can be certain that any abridgement of the right to own firearms necessarily leads to other human rights abuses and violations. Those who are dependent upon a coercive monopoly for their security of their lives and property are never secure in anything.
Do you believe that lethal force is an inalienable and foundational right?
This post was provided by Liberty Web Alliance, the group who hosts Cop Block and many other pro-liberty websites.
If you’d like a CopBlock.org Power Post – as seen above – contact us.
We citizens don’t have the right to use lethal force, only police have that right. We citizens have the right to die of lethal force infliction. The US government has a monopoly on lethal force, torture, indefinite detention, lying, and stealing. We citizens have the right to comply with tyranny, or risk lethal force infliction. Police only protect and serve the elite, we citizens pay for it. We pay legislators to write abusive laws for us to follow, while they’re exempt.
For a bunch of activists who claim to be so peaceful, you sure talk a lot about violence.
Slappy Does this type statement make you wonder about the rest of these “activists” casuse and ideas?
Ya,
It’s funny slappy, you absolutely right. It’s the same fuckers who talk about peace that will shoot you in the face when you don’t conform to their agenda. Hypocrisy by it’s very definition. Just read Obama may try to use executive order to take our guns so that we may not be able to protect our families, ourselves, and our way of life from not only the bad guys but the government as well. I have to draw the line in the sand somewhere as a man, a father and an American, if you they even try it………….well today is a good day to die.
We can debate on how much we hate cops until we are blue in the face, but at the end of the day, we are in this together and we all need to ask ourselves where that line stands. You cops reading, understand that this type of tyranny will affect you to more so than most. You can call me a conspiracy nutcase if you want but reality can sometimes be so much more stranger than fiction. When those government agents come, foreign U.N. troops, and mercenary thugs come I hope your on our side. Gun confiscation and the use of violence to achieve that goal is not out of integrity and morals of our government.
I just got the email, Obama is gonna ban cars, take your guns, and slow down your internet bandwith!
The march of the NWO has begun!
Yes it is a right, one of many that government employees should not have while they are living off the tax payers.
The 2nd amendment says you have the right to own and bare arms. It doesn’t say what kind of weapon you can own or how many. Bullets aren’t included in the 2nd amendment as well.
@Slappy
That’s a joke, i hope. Because the 2nd was clearly referring to guns that are fully functional.
@Common
Who needs a NWO when Obama is clearly getting himself fitted for a crown.
Sorry, every 4-6 years, people get fearful that the ‘government are gonna take my guns’ after the cheese falls off some nutter’s cracker and they slay a group of people/children and shockingly, its never happened. Even when the AWB and the Brady bill passed, did crime stop? No. Did people stop buying guns? No.
Since the mid 1980′s, there have been bills enacted, expired, ruled unconstitutional etc, about gun control and in the end, the nation has not been ‘disarmed’ by the government.
US gun manufacturers produce around 5 million firearms and import another 3 million. There are atleast 90 million registered firearms in the US, not including unregistered rifles and shotguns. Since 1998, there have been 150 million NCIS background checks in order to purchase a weapon.
You might as well try and ban driving…