You know the drill: Legal guns, legal conduct.
Those guys in costumes love to chomp that gum don’t they.
Thanks for what you do Warren. I wouldn’t want to touch that guy’s hand anyway.
Categorized | Articles
31 Responses to ““Get Down With The Sickness” Cops..Legal Guns..Intimidation etc…(Video)”
Trackbacks/Pingbacks
-
[...] “Get Down With The Sickness” Cops..Legal Guns..Intimidation etc…(Video) is a post from Cop Block – Badges Don't Grant Extra Rights [...]
Leave a Reply
Connect with Copblockers in your area
© 2009-2013 by its author and licensed under a Creative Commons - Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported license unless specified otherwise.
Copying is not theft. Please share our content! Sitemap | Member Liberty Web Alliance
Copying is not theft. Please share our content! Sitemap | Member Liberty Web Alliance
Many cops have refused to shake my hand as well during traffic stop encouters, or just out in public. I once asked the sheriff of the town I lived in why some cops refuse this common friendly gesture. The response was that same old officer safety BS. It is my belief that officers refuse to shake peoples hands because they do not like the individual or what they are doing. In the above mentioned case it appeared the officer knew right away what the open carriers were doing and disapproved.
Those are Police Officers. They deserve the title. Thats the way it should go….EVERY TIME!!
It’s idiots like him and his buddy that will get guns taken away. Why carry an assault rifle in public? Why don’t you exercise a little common sense especially after the Sandy Brook incident. You are the poster child for anti gunners. They look at you and show how an idiot with a assault weapon will walk around scaring the public. If weapons are taken away it will be the fault of you and every other activist who lives for drama.
LOL, to all you cop trolls, get used to seeing men and woman on the streets open carrying and if you don’t like it maybe you should try take them away!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Slappy, educate yourself my friend. An AR-15 is not an ASSAULT RIFLE it is a semi auto, similar to a mini 14 like I have, with a large capacity clip. Assault rifles are fully auto or 3 round burst similar to real AK-47′s and M16′s. The term “assault rifle” is term used to describe standard service rifles for most modern armies. A citizen cannot purchase army weapons with out very strict and specific licensing and they are extremely expensive. Just because it has a fancy black composite folding stock, some cool machining and large capacity clip does not make it an assault rifle. Jesus, would it make anyone happier if it had a wood finish LOL. Same thing. As far as destructive power a combat shot gun is a far scarier weapon that someone can buy off of the street.
Slappy, That would be Sandy Hook and I think it is great that these gentleman are exercising their legal and constitutional rights. You should appreciate that and do it yourself. Where I live, here in the the butthole of the United States, suburb of Chicago they will call out swat teams and assassinate you for exercising your rights, LOL, but not for long.
I was at the VFW with some friends and even the old timers are starting to get pissed about over reaching government and their agents (cops) doing this type tyrannical bullshit to people. They did not fight for this crap and neither did I or my generation.
REMEMBER AN ARMED SOCIETY IS A SAFE SOCIETY JUST ASK THE SWISS………
Carrying any kind of rifle out in public just to prove that it’s legal is ignorant and dangerous.
A gun is a tool, like any other. Would you carry a crescent wrench or screwdriver around with you, just because it’s also legal?
Cop, for the most part, are fearful and dangerous. When one of them finally shoots one of you open carry guys, you think they’ll face any repercussions? It will be – “He turned towards me holding the rifle, and fearing for my life, I shot him. And in the course of a panicked discharge of my entire clip, I also shot 3 cars and a dog.” And even though it will be a bad shooting, it will be your own fault. Because you just had to prove that point about open carry.
Oh and as far as Sandy Hook, one armed teacher or administrator would have saved 20 children that is a FACT. The cops could not and would not have stopped this massacre and that is a FACT. Cops will not and do not have to by law put themselves in danger to save a citizen that is a FACT. Gun control only benefits criminals and tyrants that is a FACT. I dare anyone to dispute any of what I just said……….
Certain that is hypothetical stupidity
@BED,
What a bunch of non-factual statements. You have no standard to base your “facts” on, therefore nothing to “dispute” as you state.
Any and all “weaponry” manufactured should be available to all, even military grade M4′s, SAW’s, M203 Grenade Launchers, RPG’s, Tanks, F16′s, etc..? Help me understand, when you state “Gun Control” what is your definition of such? Where do we as a society, ensure application of the 2nd Amendment, in a forthright and rational manner?
As to this video, the ability to articulate effectively, and speak proficiently would be greatly advantageous. Lot’s of um, and ah, and oh’s.
An assault weapon is defined as Any selective-fire firearm capable of fully automatic, semiautomatic or burst fire at the option of the user.
BIGPOOPY,
What the fuck are you talking about? My facts are baseless? Let me get this straight, what your saying is that any armed teacher or administrator at Sandy Hook could not have saved a lot of deaths from happening, are you saying that the cops can and will give their lives for a citizen and that it is law that they have to, are you saying gun control doesn’t help criminals and tyrants or did you just not read my post. Your an idiot! Everything I said was relevant and in FACT the truth. Go bury your head and let the big boys debate.
One more thing, by your limited reasoning your saying that semi auto weaponry is an assault rifle is utter non sense. By that thinking, my 1911, or my Glock, or my mini 14 or many of my other fine weapons are assault weapons. Again your stupid, I am a veteran and I tell you, boy, that I know what assault weapons are and your definition is just your interpretation. As for the second amendment and my definition of gun control, I can tell you this, if you can afford it I don’t care if you own it or not. Not sure if I agree that grenade launchers and RPG’s should be available to the general public without certain licensing, and you can purchase tanks go to any army/navy surplus and they can probably line you up with one, you can also buy military planes if you got the coin. Now their arming capabilities are not in tact but a little retro fitting can fix that finding ammo that is another story. The last time I checked, and I’m looking at my 1911 right now you can’t have a “selective” fire option on it but it is still a semi auto. Here let my check my mini 14, oh ya there is no “selective” fire switch on it either, that only applies to full auto or burst otherwise it is all semi auto or as fast as you can pull the trigger, dumb fuck. Unless of course you have a revolver, pump action, bolt action or something like that. Do you even know what the fuck your talking about?
Not shaking hands is perfectly understandable. I wouldn’t. You’d be sick all the time.
Cops need to learn to accept legal activity, even if offensive or stupid. I’m of two minds about open carry. On one hand, if a criminal sees me armed, he won’t bother me. There are easier targets. That is the goal, leave me alone. I don’t want trouble. I want my gun to rust away. On the other hand, concealed carry has them shitting bricks to approach anyone. Of course I’m not worried about protecting everyone else. But there are down sides to open carry. For one, they know you have a few hundred dollar untracable gun. That can make you a target.
I’d be satisfied with problem free concealed carry. Why flas a gun around?
Maybe if those who have a gun problem got a little more educated, the phobia would end. Like was said, an AR isn’t an assault rifle. It is actually less powerful than the old M1. The bullet is smaller.
Don’t those cops have something better to do?
-Thorax232
——————————————–
Family Survival Course Book
@BED,
Let’s keep this at a relatively civil level. Fuck you, too. That being said, thanks for your service, as a fellow Veteran, you can kiss my Uncle Sams Misguided Child’s Ass, as well.
As to your “Facts” regarding a School Administrator and/or a Teacher being armed “could have” saved a lot of death from happening, is the “Woulda, Coulda, Shoulda” argument. In your initial post you didn’t state “Could have saved” you stated “one armed teacher or administrator WOULD HAVE saved 20 children that is a FACT”. That’s not a fact, that’s a theory, and a poorly chosen one at best. To have an “Expendable” and/or “Rambo” teacher/School Admin on duty is pie in the sky thinking.
As a Veteran, I’m sure you’re aware what happens when the rounds start coming down range, and the training that’s associated with maintaining that composure in a combat setting. The concept of putting a “civilian” in there to protect a group of children from a madman with Bushmaster 223, doesn’t cut the proverbial mustard.
Other security measures can have a better, more secure/safer impact than a teacher/admin with a gun. Check you facts.
As to a rational discussion on 2nd Amendment rights, we seem to be at an impasse. You seem to think “if you can buy it, you should be able to own it”. I think that’s ludicrous. What rational does any American need an M203 or an RPG? Assault maybe? Not much hunting/self defense with a grenade launcher.
As a 1911 enthusiast, as well, I’m cognizant of the fact these we’re military issue through the mid 80’s. One might wonder, would the US Military provide a “non assault weapon” to troops in the field?
@BED, I wouldn’t shit you. You’re my favorite turd!
“Any and all “weaponry” manufactured should be available to all, even military grade M4′s, SAW’s, M203 Grenade Launchers, RPG’s, Tanks, F16′s, etc.”
Other than the M4 and the SAW, which can be replaced with the equivalent pre-1986 weapons, all of those items can be owned by the general public if the tax stamps are paid.
“if you can buy it, you should be able to own it”. I think that’s ludicrous. What rational does any American need an M203 or an RPG? Assault maybe? Not much hunting/self defense with a grenade launcher. ”
Because the government employees have access to them. The 2nd Amendment is not about hunting or self defense. It is in the BOR so that citizens can kill government employees who try to impose tyranny. That includes any misguided children who forget their oath and that they work for the CITIZENS.
Certain = Common Sense… They are the same account just with a name change, I would put money on it! I agree with what they are doing, it is fact that crime stats including gun crime is the highest in gun control area’s! I can guarantee that if any criminal’s were thinking of making an appearance and saw these two guys, they would have a rapid change of heart. As stated above, the least violent country is Switzerland who have armed citizens and no army! Take the gun’s away or restrict them and you end up like the crime capital Chicago! Pharmaceutical’s specifically antidepressants have a lot to answer for and the last four massacre’s were perpetrated by individuals on these mass murder pills! Of course the puppet media who are now funded big time by the murder pill company’s will never mention these facts or any other facts that go against their evil plans! God bless us all.
BIG POOPY,
LOL, Man you can argue semantics all day, point is your whole argument was weak like your mouth is big and you need to just quit trying, bro. You tried telling me that my beliefs on the 2nd amendment are not the way YOU see it. So what mother fucker, I think your view on the 2nd amendment is misguided and contentious, but that’s your business. Let me say this if one of my kids went to a school that was protected by an armed, trained and responsible teacher or administrator I would feel better about it, FACT. If they were trained why not, it would be just like having a cop in the school and at least whoever tries to shoot up the school might think twice knowing that some woman with badass boomstick is willing to put a hole in their ass if they even try hurting one them kids. You right though, when the shootin starts all the shit you learn at boot camp and the rules of engagement and the training go right out the window. You can’t count on the cops to save your kid so in your world line em up like meat shields. So what is the answer there big poop? At least I have an answer. Like the old saying goes, there is never a cop around when you need one.
Here is another FACT if you want to get the proper licensing you can buy military grade weaponry. Shit is expensive as hell but be my fucking guest. Again, so what mother fucker.
In the USA, small arms such as pistols, shotguns and rifles can all be legally purchased by anyone with an FFL (Federal Firearms License.) The FFL is really only needed for an automatic weapon such as the M249 SAW (Squad automatic Weapon) and the M-16.
Older, obsolete weapons can be purchased legally with the caveat of not having an explosive component. i.e. panzerfausts, grenades, mines, etc.
Any weapon that is designed with an actual explosive (Mortar rounds and M203 Grenades) will be unavailable for purchase. You can obtain “Cutaways” and inert rounds though.
Finally, most weapons that are designed as less than lethal can only be purchased by civilian authorities such as police departments.
Is this a good enough answer for you BIG POOPY. Fuck you annoying.
Last but not least, I know you didn’t want to argue that whole semi auto, fully auto thing you tried busting me out about, do you. Because you where strait up WRONG. You see I can tell whats happening is your trying to save face and not look stupid but if you want keep it up, I’m sure my brain pan is vastly superior to yours. Dumb fuck………………
@devil: Abby, wrong jumps to mind. All the info out of Sandy Hook indicates that he shot himself when an officer approached him. Looks like you missed on you “facts” / opinion.
“Why would anyone need to blah blah blah…”
You really don’t need a fair and speedy trial.
You really don’t need the right to protest a funeral.
You really don’t need the 3rd amendment anymore, either.
You really don’t need the right to remain silent either.
It’s not about what YOU think I need. I have the right to own any weapon I want. The police dispatcher should be trained how to differentiate between a gun attack, and a gun. If someone calls the police saying, “I saw a gun!! *fainting spell*” the dispatcher should know enough to ask, “is the person carrying the gun committing an actual crime?” If the answer is no, maybe send an officer to talk to the nosy nancy about clogging up the 911 system, and explaining that abuse of the 911 system is more of an actual crime than carrying a gun.
@ any dipstick on here confusing a true term with the broad generalization U.S. legal term. From Wikipedia.
An assault rifle is a selective fire (either fully automatic, burst-capable, or semi-automatic modes of operation) rifle that uses an intermediate cartridge and a detachable magazine. It should be distinguished from the US legal term assault weapons.
Assault weapon refers to different types of firearms, and is a term that has differing meanings and usages.
In discussions about gun laws and gun politics in the United States, an assault weapon is most commonly defined as a semi-automatic firearm possessing certain features similar to those of military firearms. Semi-automatic firearms fire one bullet (round) each time the trigger is pulled; the spent cartridge case is ejected and another cartridge is loaded into the chamber, without the manual operation of a bolt handle, a lever, or a sliding handgrip. An assault weapon has a detachable magazine, in conjunction with one, two, or more other features such as a pistol grip, a folding stock, a flash suppressor, or a bayonet lug.
The use of the term “assault weapon” is also highly controversial, as critics assert that the term is a media invention,[7] or a term that is intended to cause confusion among the public by intentionally misleading the public to believe that assault weapons (as defined in legislation) are full automatic firearms when they are not.[8]
It is always amazing to note that in the cases of shootings where a weaponw as introudced against the violent asshole, the loss of life was minimal. When compared to the loss of life in gun free zones when some ashole decided to go on a killing spree. Here are some totals that Ann Coulter included in a post of hers a few weeks abck:
– Mayan Palace Theater, San Antonio, Texas, this week: Jesus Manuel Garcia shoots at a movie theater, a police car and bystanders from the nearby China Garden restaurant; as he enters the movie theater, guns blazing, an armed off-duty cop shoots Garcia four times, stopping the attack. Total dead: Zero.
– Winnemucca, Nev., 2008: Ernesto Villagomez opens fire in a crowded restaurant; concealed carry permit-holder shoots him dead. Total dead: Two. (I’m excluding the shooters’ deaths in these examples.)
– Appalachian School of Law, 2002: Crazed immigrant shoots the dean and a professor, then begins shooting students; as he goes for more ammunition, two armed students point their guns at him, allowing a third to tackle him. Total dead: Three.
– Santee, Calif., 2001: Student begins shooting his classmates — as well as the “trained campus supervisor”; an off-duty cop who happened to be bringing his daughter to school that day points his gun at the shooter, holding him until more police arrive. Total dead: Two.
– Pearl High School, Mississippi, 1997: After shooting several people at his high school, student heads for the junior high school; assistant principal Joel Myrick retrieves a .45 pistol from his car and points it at the gunman’s head, ending the murder spree. Total dead: Two.
– Edinboro, Pa., 1998: A student shoots up a junior high school dance being held at a restaurant; restaurant owner pulls out his shotgun and stops the gunman. Total dead: One.
By contrast, the shootings in gun-free zones invariably result in far higher casualty figures — Sikh temple, Oak Creek, Wis. (six dead); Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Va. (32 dead); Columbine High School, Columbine, Colo. (12 dead); Amish school, Lancaster County, Pa. (five little girls killed); public school, Craighead County, Ark. (five killed, including four little girls).
All these took place in gun-free zones, resulting in lots of people getting killed — and thereby warranting inclusion in the Mother Jones study.
I am also reminded of the interview of a female police officer, I believe, who had her parents killed in the Lubby’s texas restaurant shooting in which she stated when the gunman exited the truck, if she had her gun, which police officers were not allowed to carry off duty, she could have shot him dead before he killed one person. But laws forbade it and 20 plus people died as a result.
The Myans had it right….just missed by a couple of weeks. Why? Because @certain and I accually agree on something (mostly anyway)
Open carry as a demonstration / activism is dumb. The scenerio with the rifle is spot on. But not necessarily does it have to be an officer doing the shooting. People are terrified now days. And some trigger happy person is going to armed and run into one of this idiots with a slung AK who has his hand on the pistol grip and think he is going to shoot. And who is right? Do you wait for rifle tard to start shooting? Activism with a gun is bad mojo for everyone
@d0nj3nko – You have got to be the biggest moron in the universe. You think I’m CS???? Review some of my posts, idiot, before you spew such ignorant bullshit out of your blow-hole.
Get over yourself ass-wipe. I don’t think most cops or any mall guards should be able to carry either.
BluEye, you’re the type of crackhead that makes our entire movement lose credibility with the public. Violent and out of control. And BTW, it’s “straight” up.
But I’m surprised you didn’t already know that. With your huge brain pan and all.
How sad. Certain reached over and touched intelligence….then jumped on for another lap arou d the stupid pool.
man you talk to much keep it simple shut the hell up!
YOU TALK TOO MUCH ! JESUS CHRIST !
@YankeeFan…Agreed 100% and well said!!! It’s difficult and annoying to kill a lot of people when they are willing and able to kill you back. I have said for many years that if every home in America was armed you would see an end to inhabited home invasions. Just not worth it when you know you will get shot.