Ademo’s “Improper Influence” or Edward Burke’s Abuse of Power? – You Decide

Since my arrest for “improper influence” I’ve been focused on getting back the footage taken from me and preparing for my probable cause hearing this Thursday. Despite the holiday weekend and usual bureaucratic trickery I was able to retrieve my footage today. I think three things played in a role in the success of this. One was the fact that I remained persistent with those holding the footage, often asking them to watch it themselves. The second reason was that I willingly signed a consent form allowing the police to access the footage. Meaning I didn’t have to wait for a search warrant or court hearing before this took place.  Finally, I think those who did watch the footage know that (judge) Burke abused his power when he ordered me arrested and, may have, felt bad for me – for once. One officer even commented to me, during a jail visit, that, “You (Me – Ademo) shouldn’t be here.”

Nevermind that I begged that same officer, two days prior, to watch the footage and decided for himself – he didn’t and took me to jail without seeing it. To me, making right late is better than never but now it’s time for you to decide. Watch the video and ask yourself if someone should be punished at all for this? Or would you feel good paying for someone to sit in jail over this?

Now to most it’s clear that I shouldn’t be charged with a felony, or face any punishment at all, for asking questions. But what happens when a judge clearly ignores a law? Since my hearing is coming up on Thursday I spent some time this weekend preparing subpoenas (thanks to those who helped, much love), getting them notarized and served. The latter happened this morning when (judge) Burke came into work and Jason Raspher was there to serve him. See for yourself what happened!

Yep, Burke refused a legal document that we all know he understands – being a judge and all. Still, I went to the sheriff’s office and paid them $60 to serve Burke. Either way, it highlights how their is a set of rules for them and one’s for us.

If you feel Burke abused his power please take a moment to call the gentlemen below who’ll be prosecuting me or the Keene District Court.

Chris McLaughlin – District Court DA – 603.357.9815

John Webb – Superior Court DA – 603.352.0056

Keene District Court –

Let them know your feelings and remember, I spent 2 days in jail, had to post $5,000 (cash) bail and am still facing Felony charges – for asking questions.

Meta post covering all events from my arrest to my release from jail.

  • Bob

    It appears as though Judge Burke may have lied to the security workers. Perhaps Judge Burke could or at least should be charged with false charges.

  • Stephen Powell

    Who will be the judge for your trial? Surely not Judge Burke? He made up the charge that your threatening him. He should recluse himself and be called as a witness (under oath) in your defense even if he refuses to honor his subpoena.

  • Ogre

    I should be surprised, but I have to say that I’m not. I can see Burke using his power to ensure that this video never sees the light of day in the court room. Then the case will simply be that the judge felt “scared” and “threatened” in the isolated stairway by a known criminal.

    Good luck with this case, Ademo, you’re going to need it against this criminal enterprise. When you have a bailiff that quickly arrests you simply on the word of a judge, you’re in trouble.

  • The Equalizer

    funny how i knew i didnt need to watch it to believe Ademo. but watching it made me feel like i have ESP. the judge broke the law by falsy accusing a man of making threats. complete abuse of judicial powers. wow. hate to have that scumbag judge burke over seeing any case of mine. use this eveidence to have him disbarred and removed from the bench. judge burke is a fascist scumbag. down with burke.

  • Dan Four

    Looks like has a serious payday coming when the still unfree town of Keene settles Ademo’s false arrest lawsuit.

  • Stephen Powell

    “Improper Influence” harm shall not be construed to include the exercise of any conduct protected under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution or any provision of the federal or state constitutions.”

    Exercise the First Amendment. Speak out for us, Adamo.

  • Anon

    Now see, this is the kind of thing you guys should be reporting about and standing up for. Judges who blatantly lie to avoid looking bad. I would do what Stephen suggested and subpoena the judge to testify on your behalf. If he lies, pull out the video evidence and get him on perjury. If he tells the truth, get him on making false allegations and sue him. Either way, he’ll lose out.

  • Stephen Powell

    The Keene Court should also schedule Judge Burke for a Come to Jesus meeting.

    Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor. (Exodus 20:16)

  • Maat922

    So somehow you were improperly influencing a judge who had already handed down a decision on a case? How does that work?

    You know, it’s these types of grand overlords who complain when you make “a mockery of their court”, when A: it isn’t even their court in the first place, and B: they are the laughing stock. All I’ve found from watching this activity coming from Keene, NH over the years, is a judge who is flailing wildly like a wasp-stung jackass attempting to maintain the illusion that any state has any legitimate claim over a free and peaceable human being’s life and wellbeing. Fuck him, he’s the butt of his own jokes.

    Alas, we come to a fork in the road here. This idiot is obviously chewed to death in his own lack of common integrity and impropriety like some hyperactive German Shepherd puppy’s playtoy. Now the only two questions that remain are these: He’s been successfully led into the dark, dank rat trap that he has built with his own hands. Is it worth, at this point, to work towards his disbarrment, and see what new meat you could possibly get in there instead? Or would it be more economically feasible to let him stew in his own feces as the eunuch he has made himself and just keep beating on him?

    Second question, is it time to move on the greener pastures now that this retard has proven our point for us? What’s the next town over in NH? Draw a radiius circle and find the town with the biggest dickheads going, and bank on it that their enourmous false pride will allow them to collapse the fastest and hardest.

    Truth and Justice will eventually win, every…single…time. These cops and judges make it apparent that they think they somehow are a better part of that equation than they naturally are. Just a logical note to them if they’re reading this: WE ARE ALL CREATED EQUALLY. LEARN IT.

    Stupid is as stupid does, though. I wonder if they’ll ever learn.

    Fuck it, if/(when, at this point) I move to NH, maybe I should backburner Keene as I originally intended to be my landing pad. Burke is his own bloody disgraced pulp, I wonder who they’ve got in Manch. I bet there’s a REAL piece of shit there. I’ma have to look into that.

  • Stephen Powell

    “A Florida jury found Casey Anthony not guilty on Tuesday of murder and other felony charges stemming from the 2008 death of her 2-year-old daughter Caylee.”

    You would think this verdict would serve as a reminder to the (Police) State that we, the people, still retain the ultimate authority to decide.

  • Snap

    Is Keene District Justice an elected office?


    Would it really be a smear job if his own words are used to accurately and truthfully show him to be a disgrace?

  • Bitch Burke

    hey judge burke. kiss my fucking ass. contempt that you dirty sleazy crooked lying public servant. the only threat in that exchange was from the jackass judge burke. screw him and his dumb court.

  • jack orr

    If the other Judges are not corrupt they will through it out, Not all Judges are corrupt. No laws were broken.

    Almost all cops are corrupt, they stick togetehr with the blue code of silence.

  • jack orr

    This is the website for corrupt cops Ive seen on the net, Keep up the good work

  • jack orr

    This is the best website for corrupt cops Ive seen on the net, Keep up the good work

  • Justin

    Thanks guys. Thank you for your bravery and care about our country and human rights. Thanks for hating wicked men enough to expose and topple them. Keep fighting. The more you film the further we’re distanced from the violent tipping point that corrupted men eagerly parade the people into. You are doing a great thing and preemptively stopping incredible violence that would be caused by the desperation such men lead societies into. Keep up the great work. Hats off to you.

  • Michael Schroeder

    Ademo – Good luck with this. I think you really need to present what Stephen Powell mentioned.
    I. A person is guilty of a class B felony if he:
    (a) Threatens any harm to a public servant, party official or voter with the purpose of influencing his action, decision, opinion, recommendation, nomination, vote or other exercise of discretion; or
    (b) Privately addresses to any public servant who has or will have an official discretion in a judicial or administrative proceeding any representation, argument or other communication with the purpose of influencing that discretion on the basis of considerations other than those authorized by law; or
    (c) Being a public servant or party official, fails to report to a law enforcement officer conduct designed to influence him in violation of subparagraph (a) or (b) hereof.
    II. “”Harm” means any disadvantage or injury, to person or property or pecuniary interest, including disadvantage or injury to any other person or entity in whose welfare the public servant, party official, or voter is interested, provided ***** that harm shall not be construed to include the exercise of any conduct protected under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution or any provision of the federal or state constitutions. ****

    Source. 1971, 518:1. 2006, 43:1, eff. Jan. 1, 2007.

    Verified that no changes have been made to this law in 2006-2010.

    From the New Hampshire Bill of Rights, State Constitution –

    [Art.] 8. [Accountability of Magistrates and Officers; Public’s Right to Know.] All power residing originally in, and being derived from, the people, all the magistrates and officers of government are their substitutes and agents, and at all times accountable to them. Government, therefore, should be open, accessible, accountable and responsive. To that end, the public’s right of access to governmental proceedings and records shall not be unreasonably restricted.

    Also Relevant: Bill of Rights, State Constitution

    [Art.] 10. [Right of Revolution.] Government being instituted for the common benefit, protection, and security, of the whole community, and not for the private interest or emolument of any one man, family, or class of men; therefore, whenever the ends of government are perverted, and public liberty manifestly endangered, and all other means of redress are ineffectual, the people may, and of right ought to reform the old, or establish a new government. The doctrine of nonresistance against arbitrary power, and oppression, is absurd, slavish, and destructive of the good and happiness of mankind.

    Also relevant: Bill of Rights, State Constitution

    [Art.] 14. [Legal Remedies to be Free, Complete, and Prompt.] Every subject of this state is entitled to a certain remedy, by having recourse to the laws, for all injuries he may receive in his person, property, or character; to obtain right and justice freely, without being obliged to purchase it; completely, and without any denial; promptly, and without delay; conformably to the laws.

    Also Relevant: Bill of Rights, State Constitution

    [Art.] 15. [Right of Accused.] No subject shall be held to answer for any crime, or offense, until the same is fully and plainly, substantially and formally, described to him; or be compelled to accuse or furnish evidence against himself. Every subject shall have a right to produce all proofs that may be favorable to himself; to meet the witnesses against him face to face, and to be fully heard in his defense, by himself, and counsel. No subject shall be arrested, imprisoned, despoiled, or deprived of his property, immunities, or privileges, put out of the protection of the law, exiled or deprived of his life, liberty, or estate, but by the judgment of his peers, or the law of the land; provided that, in any proceeding to commit a person acquitted of a criminal charge by reason of insanity, due process shall require that clear and convincing evidence that the person is potentially dangerous to himself or to others and that the person suffers from a mental disorder must be established. Every person held to answer in any crime or offense punishable by deprivation of liberty shall have the right to counsel at the expense of the state if need is shown; this right he is at liberty to waive, but only after the matter has been thoroughly explained by the court.

    Basically you must present that you are not guilty, not that he is, in this instance ( let that be a separate case). The fact is, his “improper influence” claim is clearly in violation of your First Amendment rights, and as such cannot be legitimately pressed against you, as long as you are able to present the above video as evidence.

    Secondarily, he has no legal basis based on his own state’s Bill of Rights and Constitution in that:
    Under article 8: … all the magistrates and officers of government are their substitutes and agents, and at all times accountable to them. Government, therefore, should be open, accessible, accountable and responsive

    Clearly Judge Burke did not comply with this. He did not “figuratively” have a door closed in your face as you sought to hold him accountable, he literally did.

    Under article 14: …Every subject of this state is entitled to a certain remedy, by having recourse to the laws, for all injuries he may receive in his person, property, or character; to obtain right and justice freely, without being obliged to purchase it; completely, and without any denial; promptly, and without delay; conformably to the laws.

    Multiple issues here: There is clearly an inability for you to obtain justice and the things actioned here, especially the $60 fee for service of a subpoena which you *had to purchase* (see.. without being obliged to purchase it) and also this was not conformably to the laws, again quite clearly, when Burke refused service of a subpoena.

    Article 15: Multiple issues here as well

    … Every subject shall have a right to produce all proofs that may be favorable to himself
    – This is how you get your video into court, period.
    … No subject shall be arrested, imprisoned, despoiled, or deprived of his property, immunities, or privileges, put out of the protection of the law, exiled or deprived of his life, liberty, or estate, but by the judgment of his peers, or the law of the land;
    – You clearly were arrested and imprisoned, as well as put out of the protection of the law in this situation. You were arrested when you were not judged by your peers or the law of the land, in that Burke was operating outside the very tenants of the State and Federal Constitutions when he had you arrested. (this is also how you win your law$uit, good sir;)

    Also of interest to you fellows is Article 18 – re: Pete and Beau with the hats.
    Amended 1978 so that court at defendant’s request may change trial to another county or judicial district.

    [Art.] 18. [Penalties to be Proportioned to Offenses; True Design of Punishment.] All penalties ought to be proportioned to the nature of the offense. No wise legislature will affix the same punishment to the crimes of theft, forgery , and the like, which they do to those of murder and treason. Where the same undistinguishing severity is exerted against all offenses, the people are led to forget the real distinction in the crimes themselves, and to commit the most flagrant with as little compunction as they do the lightest offenses. For the same reason a multitude of sanguinary laws is both impolitic and unjust. The true design of all punishments being to reform, not to exterminate mankind.

  • Michael Schroeder

    [Art.] 22. [Free Speech; Liberty of the Press.] Free speech and liberty of the press are essential to the security of freedom in a state: They ought, therefore, to be inviolably preserved.

    [Art.] 30. [Freedom of Speech.] The freedom of deliberation, speech, and debate, in either house of the legislature, is so essential to the rights of the people, ***************************that it cannot be the foundation of any action, complaint, or prosecution, in any other court or place whatsoever.**************************

    [Art.] 32. [Rights of Assembly, Instruction, and Petition.] The people have a right, in an orderly and peaceable manner, to assemble and consult upon the common good, give instructions to their representatives, and to request of the legislative body, by way of petition or remonstrance, redress of the wrongs done them, and of the grievances they suffer.

    [Art.] 35. [The Judiciary; Tenure of Office, etc.] It is essential to the preservation of the rights of every individual, his life, liberty, property, and character, that there be an impartial interpretation of the laws, and administration of justice. It is the right of every citizen to be tried by judges as impartial as the lot of humanity will admit. It is therefore not only the best policy, but for the security of the rights of the people, that the judges of the supreme judicial court should hold their offices so long as they behave well; subject, however, to such limitations, on account of age, as may be provided by the constitution of the state; and that they should have honorable salaries, ascertained and established by standing laws.

    New Hampshire sounds like, on paper, they know what the fuck they’re doing with Freedom. Let’s see if you guys can make it happen a bit more in real life.

  • Alex Nixon

    What exactly is the “cause of action” for “improper influence”… I can’t find one and I’ve been looking. It’s not a charge I’m familiar with and I question as to whether or not it’s a valid one. If there is no cause of action present in the pleadings (Which your lawyer should receive prior to your case) then you can dismiss the pleadings with prejudice for “failure to state a cause of action for which relief may be granted.” This is the most common dismissal and one I’ve used to relieve myself of having to pay “tickets.”

  • Pingback: No cameras in Keene court |()

  • Shigman

    OK I agree that shit was fucking rediculous. The appropriate thing he should have said was MAYBE harassing me, but that’s not even close since he was asking about a hat. Now if he said to stop in the middle of it then it could have been harassing but threatening is the most inaccurate thing he could have said Adam was doing.

  • Bruce

    Be sure to file a complaint with the FBI, they are the lead federal agency for investigating color of law abuses, at ALL levels of government. Your case certainly qualifies in my opinion.

    There may be a good ‘ol boys network in play in Keene but when you bring in the big guns that the good ‘ol boys have no power or control over, then justice has a chance. If you try and solve this at the local level you won’t have a chance, you gotta take it outside of their playground.

    From your two videos alone, I’d say it appears to be a slam dunk case.

  • Seen too much already

    No one but your attorney can talk to the judge and only with the opposing attorney present.

    You know this, you are seeking justification for stupid stuff.

    You need to grow up and stop this foolishness.

    Our country is controlled by gangsters and banksters putting you and all of us in debt and you have to cause distractions.

    Stop it, grow up, move on.

    Life ain’t fair. get over it.

  • George Sand

    @Seen too much already – I totally agree. People get their panties up in a bunch over the stupidest stuff. For instance, black people in the south during the civil rights era. There were wars going on and people starving all around the world, and all they cared about was where they could sit on a bus. They were so foolish, and seeking justification for stupid stuff. They needed to grow up and move on. Life ain’t fair. They should have gotten over it. Same with gay people. Who cares if a couple of them got beat up? There were more important things to worry about and all they cared about was their sexual preference. Such stupid stuff. Life ain’t fair. They should have gotten over it.

  • George Sand

    @ seen too much – I could go on and on about the stupid people “seeking justification for stupid stuff” who need to “grow up” and “move on.” The Jews! What was the big deal about curfew or wearing a gold star? People were dying everywhere and it was a fucking world war! Life ain’t fair. They should have just gotten over it. Such petty complaints. Slavery too. Man, things could have been so much worse. Only a minority of masters were beating their slaves to death. Most didn’t. So all those slaves trying to rebel really should have just been grateful that things were not much, much worse. Life ain’t fair, they should just stop complaining, accept their station in life and move on. And the Japanese. What’s the big deal about being in an internment camp and having the government steal all your possessions? Big fucking deal. Life ain’t fair, move on. There were people dying, starving, fighting world wars. What’s the loss of some money and a couple of years of your life?

  • Xaq Fixx

    time to get some ZionEyez glasses ( to wear to the court, every time.

  • io

    I am not a lawyer. The Judge is acting in his official capacity and thus under the color of law.

    I would also report this to the FBI who are charged with investigating the “Color of Law Abuses”

    United States Code – TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 13 § 242
    § 242. Deprivation of rights under color of law

    Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.—-000-.html

    … in part reads…

    Color of Law Abuses

    U.S. law enforcement officers and other officials like judges, prosecutors, and security guards have been given tremendous power by local, state, and federal government agencies—authority they must have to enforce the law and ensure justice in our country. These powers include the authority to detain and arrest suspects, to search and seize property, to bring criminal charges, to make rulings in court, and to use deadly force in certain situations.

    Preventing abuse of this authority, however, is equally necessary to the health of our nation’s democracy. That’s why it’s a federal crime for anyone acting under “color of law” willfully to deprive or conspire to deprive a person of a right protected by the Constitution or U.S. law. “Color of law” simply means that the person is using authority given to him or her by a local, state, or federal government agency.

    The FBI is the lead federal agency for investigating color of law abuses, which include acts carried out by government officials operating both within and beyond the limits of their lawful authority. Off-duty conduct may be covered if the perpetrator asserted his or her official status in some way.


    Civil Applications

    Title 42, U.S.C., Section 14141 makes it unlawful for state or local law enforcement agencies to allow officers to engage in a pattern or practice of conduct that deprives persons of rights protected by the Constitution or U.S. laws. This law, commonly referred to as the Police Misconduct Statute, gives the Department of Justice authority to seek civil remedies in cases where law enforcement agencies have policies or practices that foster a pattern of misconduct by employees. This action is directed against an agency, not against individual officers. The types of issues which may initiate a pattern and practice investigation include:

    * Lack of supervision/monitoring of officers’ actions;
    * Lack of justification or reporting by officers on incidents involving the use of force;
    * Lack of, or improper training of, officers; and
    * Citizen complaint processes that treat complainants as adversaries.

  • Guy

    The probable cause hearing is an administrative hearing. Check out your local and state rules. Only a member of the administration can be a defendant, one of the people is always the plaintiff. All courts are administrative. All cases are civil. See the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Do not be tricked into a plea. Stand on your position as plaintiff. Bring charges against all the state actors for violating their administrative and fiduciary duties.

  • Mr. Schroeder

    @Seen too much already –
    You’re right. Why on earth is anyone making something out of nothing of a Judge who repeatedly violated no more than 8 of the Rights laid out in the Bill of Rights of his State’s Constitution and no fewer than 3 of those laid out in the Federal Bill of Rights.

    Your grow up and move on mentality is what allowed this shit in the first place, a mind set originally perpetrated by the “Greatest Generation” and continuing to this day.

  • Guy

    Ademo, please take the time to listen to episode 441, for an explanation on the admin courts, at the following link:

    Very, very important.

  • Nick waitches

    Cops are gangstalking Cointelpro, KKK terorrist, They have a license to commit crimes, Their full time job is to lie, thats how they frame everybody. They will never admit they did anything wrong, they will shoot a kid in the back, they will make up a story to try to get out of, even if you have many witnesses and video evidence that corrupt crap will still lie about everything. Their worse then any criminal on the street, nobodys even close.

  • Pingback: Ademo’s “Improper Influence” or Edward Burke’s Abuse of Power? – You Decide |

  • 86.100club

    I know that there are a few good cops on the forces across america…but when they turn a blind eye they are guilty of the crime as well. I commend this officer for stating the truth behind the matter…however his true courage would be to COME forth publically to help make a difference. I am a victim of police brutality. I was BEATEN by cops….. shortly after I was beaten a good samaritan, who was female, rushed to the aid of an officer who was wrestling with a suspect on the street. The suspect was trying to get the officers gun, or so he alledges. My point is. a woman came to his defense and probably saved his life while helping him…..why did he not stop the brutality being forced against me? He witnessed it.. He was present? why did he not help me? WHY? my life has forever changed my spirit is broken ! Mt trust has been distroyed. Good COPS ….. PLEASE MAKE SURE your colleagues are not abusing their authority in your presence. Do you know the truth behind the 3 Monkeys…hear no evil, see no evil, speak no evil? This DOES NOT APPLY It is crucial that officers see hear and report anything violent against a citizen We are counting on you for our future generation….OUR CHILDREN!!!

  • PRM


  • Fab

    So what happened?

  • Pingback: Public Officials “DOXed” – Anonymous Lawyers Wanting to Help Jason Talley - Free Keene()

  • Pingback: Motion To Depose Four Judges: DENIED – Motion To Change Venue: DENIED | We Will Record()

  • Pingback: Edward Burke – Another Public Figure Gone Wrong - Free Keene()

  • Desire Belmore

    Greenfield NH Police are corrupt! They had posession of pictures I took of my illegal actitivities with drugs and did nothing! Corrupt! They need to be brought down to the level they are! Whale shit! 1000 leagues under the sea!!!

  • Patty

    If I am remember correctly, isnt Ed Burke a big A-hole? Wasnt he in Hillsborough County?

  • Patty

    BTW although I agree the majority of police are corrupt lying thieves and the Judicial system is run by morons with IQs lower than our mentally ill but heres a good story of justice. Judge Runyon of the Jaffrey Court overturned an 18 month guilty verdict because sleaze ball Desire,Belmore of Greenfield perjured himself to get Patty Donovan convicted.
    So chin up, for at least out of 2 milion cases 1 might be justice LOL however the act of justice is rare.