Manchester Police Still Haven’t Learned; Face Lawsuit for Wiretapping Arrest

If you’ve been visiting for a few years you probably know about the Manchester (New Hampshire) Police Department and, possibly, my interactions with them from 2011/2012. For those of you who don’t know about this corrupt police department, let me get you up to speed. Between 2011 and 2012 I had two court cases with the “City of Manchester” that started when their police arrested me (and 8 others) for chalking the police station and felony ‘wiretapping,’ when I broke a story of excessive force by a MPD employee at a local High School. In short, I was found guilty and sent to jail on both charges. Later the Supreme Court threw out my felony wiretapping convictions and I took a plea deal when the stated charged me again with lesser charges (not wanting to do another trial, since ‘winning’ wasn’t possible).

Click the links below for more information about each of those cases.




cameraML_1Recently I had learned from Brandon Ross, who was my attorney for my appeal and second round of wiretapping charges in Manchester, about Alfredo Valentine’s case with the Manchester Police Department. It seems the Manchester Police haven’t learned their lesson when it comes to their officers being recorded during the course of their public duties. Valentine’s case differs from mine in a few ways. First he was recording them in public and that’s something that’s been clarified in the Glik Ruling (from the 1st circuit Court of Appeals) several years ago. Second, he’s recording an interaction that involves a search of his home. Had the officers simply provided Valentine with a warrant or an explanation of their presence then he probably wouldn’t have felt the need to highlight the officers egregious, or illegal, actions.

Inside the lawsuit (see below), filed June 19th in District Court, Valentine details the events which lead up to his arrest, loss of job and current medical difficulties. He claims that on March 4th, 2015 the Manchester Police executed a search warrant on his home because his roommate was the subject of a drug investigation. Even though the police knew Alfredo and Christopher (the roommate suspected of drug crimes) were not home, violent, or in possession of firearms, the police still choose to raid the home with armed men using flashbangs and other weapons. In fact, the Manchester Police already had Christoper in custody, the Police literally could have walked into the home without any show of force but they didn’t.

When Valentine got a call from his neighbor saying she had his dog he was confused as to how the dog could have gotten out. Still, he left work to retrieve his dog, he put no thought into his neighbor’s statement referencing that the police were all over the area because he never thought the police would have a reason to be in his home. When he approached his home he passed by two undercover officers and encountered a few more as he entered his home. At this point the police officers, although he still did not realize that is what they were, and Valentine were having a verbal exchange. The police wanted him to leave and he wanted to know why they were there. This is when one officer, Sanders (according to the lawsuit), flashed his badge and claimed to have a warrant. Valentine asked to see it but Sanders denied that option, instead told him to come back in one hour. Valentine could have stayed but choose to leave the property and return in one hour.

NH_Manchester_City_PDOne hour later Valentine returned to his property and parked at his neighbor’s. Upon exiting his vehicle he activated his recording device on his smartphone (learn more about smartphone apps here) and held it out in the open at chest level. The previous officer, Sanders, and another – Laveille – were still there and one of them approached Valentine out in front of his home. Valentine asked again to see the search warrant for his home and personal property. While Laveille was declining Valentine’s request of legal proof, Sanders was walking circles around him and at one point noticed the phone was on. Sanders interrupted the conversation about the search warrant by asking, “Are you recording?”

Laveille immediately stopped explaining the denial of proof for the search warrant and joined into the conversation about the phone recording audio. After a short discussion Laveille says he’s “done” with this conversation and tells Valentine to leave, which he does, but before he can get to his car he hears Laveille say, “Mr. Valentine, stop. We’re going to arrest you for wiretapping.” At that time the duo of Manchester Police thuggery attempted to seize Valentines phone, but he was able to lock it before they took possession of it. This clearly irritated the MPD thugs and they have since kept his phone in their possession so it cannot be released.

Furthermore the MPD, along with the District Attorney’s Office, purposefully added Valentines name to the press release about the raid on his home. Even though Valentine was NEVER CHARGED WITH ANY CRIME RELATING TO THE SEARCH, as the public release falsely stated. “[Valentine] was arrested in connection with the eightmonth heroin investigation which yielded over 300 grams of heroin and $16,000 cash.” This press release cost Valentine his job of 11 years with Long Champs Electric, where is was an accounts payable manager. The domino effect doesn’t stop there either, due to his lose of job and bad press – thanks to bad tips from police, Valentine hasn’t been able to find another line of employment. This also has affected the medical care he is in need of, as he no longer has medical insurance. 

The Glik ruling was 4 years ago now and the Manchester Police have direct experience with wiretapping cases, so they know they are subject to recording in public space – thanks to the many CopBlockers in Manchester. Why they did this to Alfredo Valentine is picture clear. They either didn’t have a warrant to show him at the time, they merely wanted to punish him for questioning their authority or they were caught saying some pretty stupid things on that recording. Either way, I guess they’re about to get another lesson in public transparency, the right to record and a slap in the face to the tune of 1.2 million dollars. Which is what Valentine seeks in damages.

I’m pretty sure I gave them a good headache, yet, I wasn’t able to affect their budget with a lawsuit, since I actually called the public officials on the phone, but Valentine didn’t. He’s clearly the subject of police intimidation and I hope he shoves it right up their asses.

Welcome back to the pages of Manchester PD. You just never learn do you?

Places to Reach Out to the Manchester PD:

Facebook page

Website Contact:

Phone: (603) 668-8711

Alfredo Valentine by CopBlock

Pledge $1/month to help spread the message that, "Badges Don't Grant Extra Rights."
Pledge $1/month to help spread the message that, “Badges Don’t Grant Extra Rights.”

Ademo Freeman

was born and raised in Wisconsin, traveled the country in a RV dubbed “MARV” and is an advocate of a voluntary society, where force is replaced with voluntary interactions. He’s partaken in projects such as, Motorhome Diaries, Liberty on Tour, Free Keene, Free Talk Live and is the Founder of

If you enjoy my work at, please, consider donating $1/month to the CopBlock Network or purchasing Gear from the store.

Find Ademo at these social networks:

  • Joseph Murray

    Good luck to Mr. Valentine!

  • Topher Freeman

    Incoming comments from ignorant idiots telling us, “Well if he just shut up, listened to the cops and let them tear his house apart, he wouldn’t have gotten arrested”.

  • Typical

    If we know anything at all about the police it is they will double down on their stupidity anytime they are given a chance.

  • t

    Wait….you,gave them a headache by violating this sites creed of “never take a plea”?

  • t

    If you insist on video recording…there can be consequences…like getting arrested. The first amendment says congress can’t abridge speach…but we’re not congress.

  • Difdi

    That’s true, you’re not Congress. You have less power than Congress does, and more restrictions.

    There’s a good reason why it only restricts Congress like that — only Congress can pass laws that make such behavior illegal and they are prohibited from doing so. Without a law being passed, there cannot be a law for police to enforce. When the system isn’t corrupt, police who commit crimes get to see the wrong side of a prison cell door.

    I would like to refer you to the Department of Justice page about public officials (such as police) violating Constitutional rights or retaliating against people for exercising them:

  • t

    But the system is corrupt…so we get away with wehatever we we want

  • JC

    You are so fake Ademo. First off, you were the corrupt one. You recorded people without their permission. That has nothing to do with the Glick decision. You are the first to whine and cry when an officer records you out in public. You were initially found guilty of 3 counts of felony wiretapping. One charge was dropped later. You did it, you even recorded yourself doing it. You then took a plea deal and disappeared for a while so not to get into trouble while on probation. Valentine is the same as you.

  • FlashF

    Gannon’s Law needs to be passed…to stop abuses like this.

  • bdross

    “One charge was dropped later.”

    No. All three charges were reversed by the New Hampshire Supreme Court.

  • Randy Bobandy

    I smell bacon, you smell bacon?

  • JC

    No. He has two felonies out of Wisconsin for drugs. He was convicted of three felony wiretapping. His lawyer argued to the supreme court and he had one felony dropped. He also took a plea deal.

  • bdross

    As the attorney who argued that case at the Supreme Court, I assure you that all three felony wiretapping charges were vacated.

  • Patrick H.

    Whats that JC, recording is illegal you saying? All those poeple not getting arrested today.

  • JC

    I looked up Ademo’s record. The two convictions are on there.

  • Andrew

    I was right. You are just a troll. Don’t you ever get bored of doing this??

  • Pingback: TSA Claims You Need Permission to Record Airport Screenings()

  • Pingback: NH Judge Says Secretly Recording Police is Legal, Dismisses Wiretapping Charge | Cop Block()